ACTIVISTS UPDATE: Posted Monday, October 20, 2014
THE AUSTIN AMERICAN STATESMAN HAS ENDORSED DR. LAURA PRESSLEY FOR AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL IN DISTRICT 4!
THE LAST AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL MEETING PRIOR TO ELECTIONS WILL BE THIS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 23 AT THE TRAVIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, 700 LAVACA. LINDA GREENE & RAE NADLER-OLENICK WILL SPEAK DURING NOONTIME CITIZENS COMMUNICATION.
THERE WILL BE 3 MORE MEETINGS OF THE PRESENT CITY COUNCIL BEFORE THE NEW COUNCIL IS SEATED ON JANUARY 2. THE SCHEDULE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE YEAR IS LINKED BELOW. YOU CAN SIGN UP BY EMAIL VIA THE LINK, IN PERSON AT THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, OR BY CALLING 512-974-2210.
Fluoride Free Austin is an alliance of concerned citizens from all walks of life united behind the goal of eliminating the dangerous and costly practice of community water fluoridation. Fluoride Free Austin is not a card-carrying, dues-paying organization. It is a fire in the minds of men and women–a fire that will not die until Austin’s drinking water is free of the artificially introduced, health damaging hazardous waste toxin fluoride. If you agree with our objectives, then, wherever you may live, you can be a part of Fluoride Free Austin. Welcome on board.
You can actively help our campaign by downloading and distributing our handouts, sending us interesting news items to post and–if you live in the Austin area–emailing, calling or writing to City Council members and signing up to speak before the City Council. You can also take advantage of our Reading Room page, with its outstanding collection of links, to educate yourself and others. Please explore our website and make use of the resources you find there.
2014 - AUSTIN'S HUGE VICTORY: CITIZENS 10-1 REDISTRICTING
In May of last year, the citizens of Portland, Oregon scored a victory over forced fluoridation so huge and so inspirational that we kept it as our main Page 1 website story for over a year. Now it's time to mark a comparable, indirectly related triumph the people of Austin achieved over roughly the same time period.
In many ways, the Austin City Council as presently constituted is a lot like Portland's. It has seven members (to Portland's five), all elected at large—in other words, city-wide rather than by precinct—to serve a metropolis of close to one million. Theoretically, this means every Council member represents every citizen. What it means in practice is that Council members feel accountable only to big-ticket donors and special interests, while Joe and Jane Average find themselves unrepresented. In Portland, this played out spectacularly with a wildly out-of-control City Council (emboldened by the lame duck status of most of them) meeting secretly with pro-fluoride lobbyists for over a year to plan the implementation of a fluoridation scheme they knew their constituents did not want. Portlanders met their treachery (there's no other word for it) with a heroic and ultimately victorious counter-campaign.
Here in Austin, similar circumstances have led to a similarly arrogant and unresponsive Council. Ensconced in a handful of fashionably upscale zip codes, they rarely venture forth to mingle with the hoi polloi except for of staged events, and their pronouncements from the dais reflect a general disdain for issues that don't positively impact their bottom line or individual political careers. Nowhere has this attitude been more clearly on display than during the Citizens Communication portion of City Council meetings, where for the past six years, council members have regularly smirked, joked, talked, texted and walked out during our 3-minute presentations. Our own issue, however, represents but a microcosm of the general public discontent engendered by such intransigence.
Austinites—well aware that City Council's elitism springs from the at-large system with its concentration of power in the hands of a few wealthy players—had made no less than six attempts since 1973 to change the city's form of government to a more equitable district-based one. All had failed. But in late 2011 a fed-up citizenry was ready to try once more. The newly-formed grassroots organization Austinites for Geographical Representation (AGR) launched a petition drive to place on the 2012 ballot a measure that would create voting districts for 10 council members plus a Mayor still elected at-large. The measure further called for a Citizens' Independent Redistricting Commission to draw up maps for the new districts. As AGR set about gathering the 20,000 verified signatures needed to force a referendum, a threatened Establishment—backed by the Mayor and a Council majority—responded with its own counter-proposal. Designed to maintain the power status quo by providing for two at-large councilmembers, an at-large Mayor, and just eight councilmembers elected by district; it would also allow the Council to draw the new districts.
Throughout most of 2012, a contentious battle of the plans raged in the local media and in Council chambers: “The People's Plan” (aka 10-1) versus “The Council's Plan” (aka 8-2-1). Although powerful special interests backed the latter, the people's determination prevailed. Austinites for Geographical Representation officially turned in their collected 33,000 signatures (more than 22,300 of them pre-verified) to the City Clerk on July 31. And on November 6, contrary to the pundits' predictions of a “squeaker,” 10-1 sailed to an easy victory of 60% - 40%.
The next year was taken up with the work of the Citizens' Independent Redistricting Committee (a story in itself). The Committee unveiled its final map on November 8, 2013. When Austinites go to the polls to choose their City Council members this November, they will vote under a new system: one which for the first time affords them a measure of local geographical representation. Which brings us to the present moment.
With the 2014 political campaign season now in full swing, Austin stands at a crossroads. November will see a new 11-member governing body of whom two at most will be incumbents. The coming fall election presents a chance to reverse some of the missteps of previous City Councils, too wedded to past errors to reverse their course. That, of course, includes water fluoridation. But the opportunity goes far behind a single issue. We must take advantage of this historic opportunity by choosing our new Council members wisely. They will set the course of our city for many years to come.
Dr. Laura Pressley has received the Austin American-Statesman's coveted endorsement for Austin City Council, District 4. Despite frenzied attempts by some of the opposition to paint her as "the crazy fluoride lady" (an issue on which she did not campaign), her experience, courage, integrity and all-around high level qualifications to serve the city, and her constituency in particular, earned the daily's respect. Congratulations, Laura!
October 12 was Fluoride Free Austin's 6th birthday! Yes, we've been around that long, educating the public and (in large part thanks to publicity from Dr. Mercola) having enormous visibility around the state and the entire country. Although we've yet to achieve our primary goal of ending water fluoridation in Austin, we have succeeded in bring the issue to widespread public attention. Considered a "fringe" issue here just six years ago, water fluoridation has gained sufficient familiarity that a 2012 KEye-TV survey revealed that half of Austinites considered it a waste of money. That number has probably increased since.
Our example has inspired similar movements in other communities large and small, some of which have succeeded in their own efforts to banish artificial fluorides from their watter supply. We believe our own turn will come under the new City Council to be seated on January 1, 2015. One thing is for certain: we will be here for as long as it takes.
October 20, 2014